May 29, 2007

The Greenpeace statement to the International Whaling Commission in Anchorage

Posted by Dave (in Anchorage, Alaska)

_MG_1674_welcome_iwc_430.jpg

Now, I wouldn't normally do this - but I reckon that this statement has a fair whack of power to it, and states exactly what Greenpeace wants from the International Whaling Commission - Dave


Greenpeace Opening Statement

International Whaling Commission 59

28 May, 2007

Anchorage, Alaska

We are pleased to be in Anchorage to observe the 59th annual meeting of the IWC and hope that the near continuous daylight will inspire and invigorate those who wish to modernise the IWC for its necessary role in the 21st century.

To make this possible, the relentless drive to resume commercial whaling must end. Commercial whaling brings no conservation benefits to whales or the oceans whatsoever. It has no role to play in the world economy or sustainable development and poverty alleviation. But while the IWC is distracted by an increasingly polarized debate over commercial whaling, some whale populations are slipping towards extinction.

All the warning signs we need are out there if we care to take notice:


  • We may well see the extinction this century of the western grey whale if incidental takes by net entanglement are not severely reduced or halted;

  • The survival of the northern right whale hangs in the balance, with ship strikes and net entanglements preventing their recovery; and this year

  • the Baiji dolphin was officially declared 'functionally extinct' after a 6 week survey in late 2006 failed to sight a single one.

Our oceans are in crisis. Marine pollution from underwater noise, debris and land based sources, climate change and its various impacts - both known and unknown, ship strikes, and of course, industrial overfishing all threaten the world's whales and dolphins. Our tendency to overfish, like commercial whaling in the past, is now seriously threatening global fish stocks and in some areas our ability to feed ourselves. Over 75% of the world's fish populations are either fully exploited, overexploited or recovering.

In the face of all of this, supporters of commercial whaling promote as fact claims that whales are the cause of declining fish populations. Yet they are unable to produce a single peer-reviewed scientific paper in support of this claim. The sad truth is that across the world's oceans, fisheries are collapsing mainly as a result of overfishing by humans and failed management regimes. But the supporters of commercial whaling know that if they can somehow blame industrial overfishing on the whales (which existed in balance with abundant fish populations well before commercial whaling began), then they will be freed from the responsibility of even having to attempt precautionary management because the objective of whaling will be to reduce the size of whale populations. Deliberate depletion of recovering populations - or marine ecosystem manipulation - would then become the goal of the IWC.

As our oceans have changed, so too must the institutions that are charged with safeguarding the life that lives within them; to focus on ensuring conservation for this and future generations. As whaling nations push for a resumption of commercial whaling, we would do well to remember how much of a disaster the 20th century was for the whales. The blue whale, the fin, and the sei were all hunted to the brink of extinction while the whaling industry, operating under IWC management, demonstrated over and over again the unsustainability of commercial whaling.

Only the moratorium has brought relief from these serial management failures which occurred because advocates of whaling controlled the IWC and managed whaling for the short term good of the industry, not the long term good of the whales or our oceans.

The 21st century must demonstrate humankind's ability to learn from our mistakes and turn the tide from overexploitation, to conservation and protection.

Already, there is broad recognition that the 21st century definition of 'sustainable use' when it comes to whales, means whale watching, not commercial hunting. Now is the time for this body to endorse that view and devote its considerable political and scientific resources to safeguarding and ensuring the recovery of whale populations everywhere, beginning with the most endangered. To do so, the Convention must be modernised. It must develop a plan to ensure the conservation of whales that includes addressing current and future threats like climate change. It must recognise that so-called 'research' whaling is untenable. You don't need to kill whales to study them, so the so-called 'scientific loophole' in the Convention needs to be removed. And it must be updated so that it accords with the accepted principles of international environmental and marine law.

In 1974, a Commissioner addressing this plenary stated,

"This Commission will be known to history as a small body of men who failed to act responsibly in terms of their very large commitment to the world, and who protected the interests of the few whalers and not the future of thousands of whales."

All parties to this Convention need to take action this week towards turning that tide, so that in 2074 it will be possible to address this body saying:

"This Commission will be known to history as a body which rose above its early mistakes to become an instrument of conservation which brought back whale species from the brink of extinction and led the way for the protection of marine biodiversity so that we can be proud of the clean, healthy and vital oceans that we have today."

Comments

Brilliant!

As long as the the "W" in IWC is a verb and not a noun, that commission will be about slaughter and not about life.

This does look like a good statement - but I found it difficult to read (and my eyesight's very good).
What's with all this tiny type?

This great piece of art is written with the heart and a sharp mind at the same time. It's also represents the visions of many people and nations on this earth.
Last news from Holland: 86 % of the Dutch people is against whaling; also to put an end to commercial- and to close the loophole of scientific whaling in Article VIII of the IWC and Japan and other whalingnations to be sanctioned!
Monica (roos)

Fantastic…keep on going Greenpeace...

A quote from Leonardo da Vinci: “ the day will came when men will see the killing of an animal as they now see the killing of a man”

amazingly well put keep up the fight and stay strong we will overcome!!

amazingly well put keep up the fight and stay strong we will overcome!!

What is wrong with those people? I find it so irritating that they are so ignorant to observe that they are desecrating the sea life.
What can we do to open their money hungry narrow minds????

Very good statement. No more polite arguments about biodiversity and sustainability. Just a steadfast NO TO KILLING WHALES. It really irritates me that Japan continues to act like a petulant child putting up the threat of slaughtering 50 Humpback whales as a bargaining chip. Keep up the good work Greenpeace. Maybe you could suggest to the Japanese Fisheries who say "that whales are not special you eat cow...bla..bla" that they should look into the eye of a Humpback for there they would see a wisdom that they will never find in the mirror.

I just want to wish you continued success in your endeavors. Keep up the good work your presence in the international arena has definitely made a significant impact on the actions of us as humans on this earth.