The world's beaches are in trouble!

Shipbreaking takes place in poor countries, where once pretty beaches in India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Turkey are turned into ship graveyards. However, old ships contain hazardous substances such as asbestos, lead paint and PCBs, which are released into the environment. The Rainbow Warrior is in India to visit the shipbreaking yards. Evedien from the Netherlands is on board....
« Dutch ship found at shipbreaking yard Alang | Main | Busy days ahead »

November 25, 2003

Achievements until now


Today is has been exactly two weeks since we started sailing from Bombay to Alang. It's a good time to review all the achievements we've reached until now. Let's see what happened on political level and what happened in the media....

At political level we count five achievements:

1 - National ministries and local authorities forced to act on shipbreaking and the implementation of the Supreme Court Order;

2 - The Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) instructed the Gujurat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) for an enquiry into the Genova Bridge (suspending cutting while this happened). The inspection team produced a 100 page report, that confirmed asbestos on board. Asbestos is one of the listed hazardous materials. This story is still unfolding and may result in demand to 'Return To Sender' the asbestos to UK; if the Basel Convention and Supreme Court Order regulations are followed to the letter.

3 - The Ministry of Environment and Forest wrote a directive to relevant authorities involved in shipbreaking industry on the implementation of the Supreme Court Order.

4 - The GPCB announced to open a permanent office in Alang for the purpose of environmental inspections of the ships that come to beach.

5 - The IMO council decided not to pursue the proposal to expel Greenpeace from our official observer status within the IMO.

At public/media level we count two achievements:

1 - Extremely high media coverage in India (both Gujurat and nationally) on the issue of shipbreaking. This helped to start a public debate that has not happened in the campaign in India so far.

2 - High coverage of the expose of the Genova Bridge and the double standards of the UK in refusing the US MARAD ships, but sending their own old ships to the developing world without decontamination. Story got good coverage in both India and UK.

Posted by at November 25, 2003 07:00 PM
Comments

Sois formidables,...
Vuestra labor y vuestra fuerza nos ayudan a todos
Muchas gracias
Pablo

Posted by: Pablo at November 25, 2003 09:30 PM

While I must congratulate you on all that you have acheived so far in Alang. I find two problems with your campaigning methods:
1. You have pissed off the governtment people so bad that they now refuse to co-operat with any group (such as ours) who are working for the improvement of environmental and labour conditions at Alang.
2. I think that you should interact more with the Gujarati public, Alang workers and the government to remove the misconceptions that they harbour about Greenpeace and its motives in Alang.

Posted by: Rupa Abdi at November 27, 2003 10:48 AM

I think Greenpeace has done well in highlighting the issues of transboundary movement of 'toxic' wastes and the double standards of the UK government.

In effect, the response from the Govt. of India has also been positive, although GPCB should have put the onus of 'detoxifying' the ship with the shipowner. But then lets not forget that the UK government was always in a position to hold the shipowner accountable for 'cleaning' the ship. It failed to act. However, we hope, in the future they would respond positively for reducing the risks of our workers being exposed to toxic material.

Even as these events have build up over the past few weeks, a reality that we now face at ground zero – Alang - is that the shiprecyclers (shipbreakers) are now very much opposed to using their platform to voice concerns regarding ‘toxic’ ships and 'communicating to ship owners for clean ships'. Alang is not the forum to voice such concerns – that’s the message that has strongly come through. Further, the inadequate rapport and lack of a participatory interaction with the local people, the shiprecylers and local institutions has created a void that has made each stakeholder of the shiprecyling industry ‘suspicious’ of each others motives. There definitely is a sense of insecurity. Probably there needs to be more transparency, easy accessibility and clarity of information being communicated to the government machinery, the local environmental groups, the workers and the ship recyclers at Alang.

In terms of achievement, the legislations and the regulatory mechanisms on clean ship recycling procedures have definitely been strengthened and so has the issue been extensively covered in the media. But these may perhaps not be the ‘true’ indicators. As of now, even towards the end of the campaigning and the inspection, no ‘collective stand or voice’ has emerged. The ‘collective voice’ is that of shiprecylers, workers, environmental groups, government machinery and the greenpeace activists pressing for accountability from the shipowners and the countries from where these ‘toxic’ ships originate. Let’s hope that in future, similar campaigns against ‘toxic’ ships start at the shores of the countries from where these ‘toxic’ ships come. That way the ‘shipowners’ would feel the ‘pinch’ of the campaign rather than the ‘shiprecylcers’. That then would be the greatest achievement.

Posted by: Shriji Kurup at November 27, 2003 06:53 PM

woo! greenpeace!

Posted by: Passthe Kechup at November 28, 2003 03:50 AM

Por un Mundo Mejor para Todos. Gracias.

Posted by: Carlos Guardingo Salvadó at November 30, 2003 12:10 AM

Great_Blog_I_agree_with_you_completely

Posted by: ncaa basketball odds at January 23, 2004 04:52 AM

Great_Blog_I_agree_with_you_completely

Posted by: march madness odds at January 23, 2004 04:54 AM

Great_Blog_I_agree_with_you_completely

Posted by: ncaa march madness at January 23, 2004 04:55 AM