Hi, I am a student at didcot and I would just like to point out that greenpeace did not actually manage to stop coal being fed into didcot A because they chained themselves to the wrong conveyer. I remember their argument being based on burning gas (not decentralsied energy) instead of coal. Didcot B is a gas and biofuel fired power station. Didcot A is due to be decommissioned within the next few years and it would be for more energy inefficient to knock it down now and build another gas station. The people at didcot are dedicated to reducing carbon emmisions just as much as greenpeace is. I also happen to know a safety manager at harwell who remembers greenpeace breaking in and demanding they switch to coal instead of nuclear for generating energy! Harwell is not even a powerplant, it is a researc facility that is being decommisioned. Why cant greenpeace work with these enormous companies instead of getting in the way of them? I am very much an environmentalist and i know there are other ways of producing clean energy other than wind and solar. Solar, by the way uses more energy in producing the cells than you would gain from 100 years of running them! Proposals such as nuclear actinide transmutation techniques, blue power water desalinisation and carbon neutral biofuels are far more promising.