Some
facts on Tasmania's forests
The Styx Valley, just 70km west of Hobart,
has the largest hardwood trees in the world. Many are taller than
a 25-storey building, over
400 years old and up to five metres wide at the base. Tasmania is
also home to the Tarkine, Australia’s largest temperate rainforest.
These forests are being logged for woodchip, using practices banned
in the rest of Australia and seen only in developing countries. Old
growth forests are clearfelled and fire-bombed from the air with petrochemicals.
Grazing animals are then poisoned with carrots laced with 1080 poison.
The
Wilderness Society, Greenpeace and other community groups are
calling for the immediate protection of about 240,000 ha of old
growth forests. This is about a quarter of the public forests currently
available for logging.
LEARN MORE:
• Valley of the Giants
• Regional Forest Agreement - why it has failed
• From majestic giants to woodchips
• What we are proposing
• Tasmania Together - broken promises
Valley
of the Giants
Eucalyptus regnans (also called “Swamp
Gum” in Tas and “Mountain
Ash” in Vic) are the world’s tallest hardwood trees -
up to 400 years old and over 80m tall. They are second only to the
Californian Redwoods
as the world’s biggest trees.
In the US they protect and mythologise their Redwoods, making them
part of their story of national greatness. In Australia we clearfell
our trees of international significance.
There is continuing debate about whether in
fact Australia once had the tallest trees - Eucalyptus regnans in
Victoria - that
were logged before being properly measured. In the Styx Valley, the
Regnans emerge out of a forest of rainforest species. In 1996, 13%
of the original cover of Eucalyptus regnans remained undisturbed
in Tasmania. Under the Regional
Forest Agreement less than half of this is genuinely protected
in national parks and other secure reserves. (6.3% is protected if
stream side and road side buffers etc are counted - of course these
provide no real ecological future.)
|
Original cover (ha)
|
Current cover (ha)
|
Current old growh (ha)
|
"Reserved" old growth (ha)
|
Formally reserved old growth (ha)
|
|
99,900 (100%)
|
76,050 (76%)
|
13,290 (13%)
|
6,320 (6.3%)
|
4,600 (4.6%)
|
Regional
Forest Agreement
In 1997 the State and federal governments signed a Regional
Forest Agreement (RFA). Both major parties in federal politics
supported the agreement. The RFA protected some forests and left
the rest open to logging and woodchipping. The RFA failed to reach
even its own targets for protection, even though these were woefully
limited.
The RFA has failed to:
- protect 60% of the remaining oldgrowth for each forest-type,
including many forest-types on public land;
- meet the 15% protection target for many forest communities;
- protect 90% of Tasmania’s wilderness forests;
- meet job-creation targets (indeed, job numbers in manufacturing have fallen);
- be transparent and open;
- reserve all areas identified for reservation; or
- generate investment in downstream processing (indeed, investment has fallen
away as some industries, such as the Burnie pulpmill, have closed down). Only 25% of Tasmania’s original extent
of old growth forests remains (1.24 million ha out of the original
4.82 million). Yet ancient
forests continue to be cleared, woodchipped and replaced by plantations.
The Tasmanian government claims 68% of old growth forests are protected.
But many of these are not in proper reserves. Old growth forests protected
are dominated by the type of communities not suitable for woodchipping,
such as dry E. nitida and short rainforest.
The RFA was supposed to protect 60% of remaining
old growth for each type of forest. But for the three main species
of tall eucalypt, this
target was not met. There are only 18% of our original tall old growth
forests left, and less than 40% of this occurs inside proper reserves
such as national parks. Much of the supposedly “protected” forest
occurs in unviable and unsuitable scraps and slivers, such as streamside
reserves.
From
majestic giants to woodchips
Tasmania is producing record amounts of export woodchip. The total
amount of wood chipped in 2000 reached 5.3 million tonnes. Since 2001,
after the takeover of North and Boral by giant logging company, Gunns
Ltd, the release of figures is prohibited.
|
Year
|
Chipped and ground wood production in
tonnes (green weight)
|
|
1997-1998
|
4,440,100
|
|
1998-1999
|
3,929,900
|
|
1999-2000
|
5,145,300
|
|
2000-2001
|
5,300,300
|
| |
Statistics are no longer available on business
confidentiality grounds.
|
Over 90% of logs taken from Tasmania’s forests ends up as woodchips
for export to Japan. Forestry Tasmania’s own figures reveal
that 84% of all logs go straight to the woodchip mill and then a large
percentage of the remaining ends up waste after sawlogging.
Although the woodchip as waste product of a saw log industry argument
continues to be run by industry and government, the table below, compiled
from the Forestry Tasmania Annual Report, reveals that 84% of all
logs extracted from State Forest goes directly to the woodchipper.
Only 16% goes to sawmills. A large proportion of this 16% ends up
as waste and is also sent to the woodchipper.
|
|
1999-00
|
2000-01
|
|
Sawlog, veneers and peeler logs
|
401,725
|
492,413
|
|
Other forest products
|
38,902
|
0
|
|
Pulpwood (woodchips)
|
2,268,564
|
2,608,087
|
|
TOTAL
|
2,709,191
|
3,100,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
% woodchip logs
|
83.74
|
84.12
|
|
% sawlogs
|
14.83
|
15.88
|
| Source: Forestry Tasmania
Annual Reports 1999-2000, 2000-2001 |
The 1999 Ryan Report, commissioned by Forests Minister Paul Lennon,
detailed rates for the recovery of sawn timber from sawlogs, and rates
for the proportion of sawlogs chipped as residues. Generally, about
one third of each sawlog becomes sawn timber, while about 55-60% is
chipped.
If you apply Ryan’s figures to the table
above, you get the following results:
3.5 % of wood extracted from State Forest becomes sawn timber.
92% of wood extracted from State Forest becomes woodchips.
“95% of Tasmania’s wilderness
is protected from logging”
The Tasmanian government claims 95% of Tasmania’s wilderness
is protected from logging. This is misleading, as most of the famous
World Heritage area to which they refer is not forested, but is buttongrass
and mountain tops. Of the forested parts of Tasmania’s wilderness,
30% remains threatened by logging. This includes most of the tall
forests.
What
we are proposing?
The Wilderness Society has a National Park proposal
which would provide protection for the remaining wilderness and old
growth forests of Tasmania. It includes the Styx, the Tarkine and
the south-west, and covers about 240,000ha of forests. We are calling
for the immediate end to old growth logging and the adoption of the
National Park plan.
We propose that the Tasmanian government declare a Styx Valley of
the Giants National Park, and that the Australian government nominate
the valley as an extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage
Area.
Federal politics needs to intervene to stop the
madness. Both major parties need to be encouraged to adopt a policy
of providing the necessary
dollars to shift the forests from a resource for extraction, to a
tourism resource. This will provide the people of Tasmania with real
long-term
economic options.
The Styx Valley and other tall forest valleys like it run along the
eastern edge of the World Heritage Boundary. The World Heritage Boundary
follows the line of the escarpment, including mountain tops and buttongrass
plains, but effectively excluding forests. The proposal for shifting
the World Heritage Boundary east to include the unlogged tall forests
(including the Styx) has been supported by: Professor Jamie Kirkpatrick
(1987, 1994 and 1999); the Tasmanian Department of Parks, Wildlife
and Heritage (1990); the Australian Heritage Commission (1987); Peter
Hitchcock (1988 and 1991); the IUCN (1989, 1990 and 1994); and the
World Heritage Bureau (1989 and 1994).
Tasmania
Together: broken promises
In 2001 the Tasmanian Government initiated a community consultation
process called Tasmania
Together. The process aims to give the people of Tasmania a voice
about the future direction of their state. The community process called
for an end to clearfelling in special places, including the Styx by
January 2003. The clearfelling continues and the latest 2003
progress report of Tasmania Together admits failure.
Visit The
Wilderness Society website for a detailed background to the
Styx campaign.
Download our Lobbying and
Letterwriting Kit for Tasmania's Ancient Forests, with tips
on how to organise public meetings, muster support, get access to
government ministers and be a successful lobbyist.
Back to top
|