19 June 2006
Wake up and smell the coffee: the "St Kitts Declaration"
From Mike, Comms officer and straight-talking Scotsman in St Kitts for the IWC
Well it finally happened, the long awaited and much anticipated Fisheries Agency of Japan majority at the IWC came yesterday to support the so-called St Kitts declaration. A fragile majority of one, 33 to 32 with China abstaining. It caused quite a ruckus in the room with a number of diplomats resorting to very undiplomatic language. But not quite as undiplomatic as the language some of us were using under our breath.
But wait a minute, what does it actually mean, what will it actually deliver for the whalers - nothing in real time in the real world. They already lost the first four votes, ones that actually would have changed things now, they wanted to end any IWC work on dolphins and porpoises, they wanted secret ballots, they wanted an exemption from the commercial whaling ban to kill minke Whales and Brydes whales inside their territorial waters, not for science but for sale, and they wanted the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary harpooned: these were real things that would have made a real difference.
In reality this is a paper victory a diplomatic victory which brings the Japanese Fisheries Agency and the whalers out of a 20 year losing streak! A diplomatic coup, one which embarrasses the hell out of the whale friendly governments, one that they will have to explain to their voters and people, to explain why they have been asleep at the wheel for a decade and have sat back and watched Japan buy out the IWC.
The only truly appalling thing in the StKitts Declaration is the fact that the IWC has backed the idea that whales eat so many fish that they are a threat to the fish stocks of small coastal communities and therefore it is a food security issue. Bullshit! Dangerous bullshit! For millions of years whales and fish got along just fine thank you very much, but that was before we came along with our factory ships, our long lines, our drift nets, our bottom trawlers, really who is eating all the fish? We will now hear the whalers saying they are slaughtering whales in order to protect the food security of impoverished coastal communities, and when any one challenges them they will say the worlds top whale body agrees with them. They should be ashamed, it really is a low blow.
For those who havent yet woken up and smelled the coffee this was the last ring of the alarm bell, act now to save the whales. A single vote majority may not even last through today, but it is an ominous sign for the future. It is a far cry from the three quarter majority needed to actually end the sanctuary or the commercial whaling ban, but it is a start. With real action backing the rhetoric from the conservation Governments it can be a false start.
Only another couple of days to go, Ill be glad when it is over, because as anyone who knows me will tell you I aint made for political conventions. Im a straight talking Scotsman (sometimes too straight talking for my own good). The diplomacy and lies that go unchecked here are driving me crazy. The horde of sartorially challenged diplomats with their passion free rhetoric makes me want to scream or cry. Honestly, I dont know how John Frizell does it, hes been coming since 1977, deploying superhuman levels of patience and eco-diplomacy. The small army of policy wonks in the Greenpeace family are among our unsung heroes. Theirs is not the glamourous adrenaline-fuelled life of an activist, no daring do on the high seas, just nasty hotels, bland conference centres often in paradises they dont have the time to see. So for the record, thanks guys.
Here in the lush surrounding of StKitts the debate is intense, views are polarised, but meanwhile back in the real world we are on the countdown to the next "scientific" whaling season in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary when 1000 whales will die, including 10 fin whales and the following year 50 humpback whales will be added to the scientific menu. In the real world the Arctic Sunrise which is currently barred from entering StKitts on the grounds of national security represents the front line for defending the whales, high level channels from Washington, Amsterdam, Berlin, Sydney, Auckland, London and the rest need to be urgently opened, the diplomats need to take a back seat and the politicians, prime ministers need to take over and stop the bloody whaing!
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://weblog.greenpeace.org/cgi-bin/mv/mt-tb.cgi/1874
Comments
Why does man have to kill everything, Nature created us, we are an inseparable part of her, and we have a duty of care towards her.
Posted by: Mark Parris at June 19, 2006 3:01 PM
This is very disturbing news about the IWC however your communication doesn't give enough information as to contacting the right people with our concerns. There is only the comment "contact your president or prime minister." It would have been helpful to give that specific information to each recipient of the alert. How do you recommend we do that and could we have addresses and email addresses?
Thank you
Posted by: lynn babicka at June 19, 2006 3:25 PM
Thanks for your straightforward and passionate comments.
Now it is up to us to get some letters written to government agencies in all those countries that supported the St. Kitts Declaration and to emphasize in the media again and again that whales are NOT responsible for the collapse of the world's fisheries.
I am waiting and hoping Japan does not have more success by getting NGO's, specifically Greenpeace, banned from future meetings.
Posted by: echo at June 19, 2006 4:07 PM
Great post Mike - if only there were more straight talking and honest people like you at the IWC - maybe the whales wouldn't be in such danger!
I'm totally pissed off about the declaration as much as you are. I'm outraged that the IWC has accepted the fish depletion bollocks when there is no scientific backing to support this nonsense.
So how can we start waking up the politicians and throwing the coffee in their faces?
L.
Posted by: Lisa at June 19, 2006 8:05 PM
A return to whaling is an appaling thought. Is there anything we ordinary people can do to further support the anti-whaling countries at the discussions. Can you suggest any European or British or Irish Mps that can be contacted to voice our concerns about a return to whaling?
I would like to be more involved in saving the Whales, its frustrating. What can we do?
Posted by: Annabel Tonge at June 19, 2006 9:35 PM
It is a blow that Japan won this vote... But 'up them'... As said above they still have a long way to go... Hopefully the antiwhaling nations will wake up!
You are all doing fantastic Greenpeace and I'm glad that you're going back to the whale sanctuary!
Together we will stop this madness!
Posted by: Heidi at June 19, 2006 9:41 PM
Hmm...nice idea Lisa.... perhaps we could all start ordering coffee mugs for politicians with "Wake up and smell the coffee! Oceans.greenpeace.org" on the side!
Posted by: Adele
at June 20, 2006 9:06 AM
Surely there comes a time when even these blockheads (japan & others) must stop and take stock of their actions. The IWC should not be held to ransom by a country that has more than enough resources to feed its own. If whale products are on the decline in their native countries then let them. If people's tastes are changing and they now longer wish to buy such products then this should be enough for them to stop.. Those countries that oppose whaling should now be united in their actions and I personally believe that a mandate should be given to yourselves (Greenpeace) to enforce their will with appropriate backing from them!
Posted by: roy kenyon at June 20, 2006 12:02 PM
Well done Mike. Your blog title should have been 'Wake Up: FEEL THE COFFEE (the heat of the whale lovers)'. By banning Greenpeace, IWC allowed itself to be bought out by the Japanese. Now we will see IWC (Meeting au Japan) after the next meeting of the committee.
Just when are the people of Japan going to feel the need to protect the whales - not kill them. After they are extinct????
Posted by: Supratibha Narayan Roy at June 27, 2006 10:59 AM
I think this is a disaster like everything we fight for. These shamefull acts against an animal which as not corsed any harm to anyone be hunted for its meat .Japan needs to sort it head out and look at what it is doing. Which i dont think it cares about.
Posted by: adrian at July 30, 2006 9:36 PM
I have read over various articles about whaling today. (Most of them in greepeace related websites)Convinced that something must be done, I'm adding to Greenpeace's campaign to protect the whales. But I have some questions. If Japan has 4000 tons of uneaten whale... why on Earth do they keep hunting? I just don't get the logic of the issue. Is there something else Japan does with the whales? Second: is there any kind of regulation for japan's factory ships to only fish for a certain amount? They are usually illegally fishing in the coasts of Chile, where they have deprived the fishermen of their food and activity! How can we make Japan realize the course it's actions are taking, and how can we make them see the damage lying ahead?
Sincerely yours,
Alex.
Posted by: Alexandra Wiche at March 6, 2007 11:11 PM
All updates from the Southern Ocean whaling 2007 leg »
All updates from the Pacific transit »
All updates from the Mexico leg »
All updates from the Hawaii leg »
All updates from the Pacific leg »
All updates from the Philippines leg »
All updates from the India leg »
All updates from the Red Sea leg »
All updates from the Mediterranean leg »
All updates from the Azores leg »
All updates from the Pirate Fishing/Africa leg »
All updates from the Southern Ocean »
Avast ye land lubbers! The ocean critters need your help!
Take action today!

