October 18, 2005
Need more proof - how about the science?
![]()
Trawled and untrawled seamount on the Chatham Rise. © NIWA
Those of you who read the NZ Herald yesterday would have seen a great story in the World section about the impact of bottom trawling on rare deep sea fish.
The article tells us that last week more than 50 of Britains leading marine scientists and ecologists have called on the UK Government to demand a moratorium on deep sea trawling at the United Nations. They warn of irreparable damage to the sea floor if action isn't taken soon.
One of the scientists, Professor Callum Roberts, will be in Australia next week to meet with politicians and key decision-makers urging them to take strong action.
They are the latest voices in an unprecedented call for action from the scientific community over the past two years.
In February 2004, 1,136 scientists from 69 countries released a statement calling on governments and the United Nations to adopt a moratorium on high seas bottom trawling. Never before had such a large number of scientists united around a specific marine environmental issue. The statement represented a turning point in the mounting global campaign to halt deep-sea bottom trawling on the high seas.
Since then the call has been echoed around the world. A particularly good collection of scientific information is in a report released earlier this year called 'Red Herrings'. It was released by the Deep Sea Conservation Council (DSCC) to debunk claims of sustainability by the bottom trawl industry and details numerous scientific studies that counters claims bottom trawling doesn't impact the sea floor.
More information about the science of the deep sea is available from the DSCC website.
And for some really interesting information on creatures of the deep, check out the diary from the Norfanz tour of 2003. This was an expedition that New Zealand and Australian scientists undertook to better understand life in the deep sea. Their diary details info about some of the new creatures the discovered along the way and they also have a 'creature feature' gallery.
So once again we ask - how much more proof do we need?
Comments on this entry:
i read your story with great fascination but it seems that you would get much!!! more impact from more before after and most importantly during footage all shown on the lead page not on several links.
Posted by: frank at January 6, 2006 3:16 AM
