Inconsistency at the Nuclear Security Summit
This is a very poor choice of words to describe the global market for nuclear materials as discussed at Barack Obama’s Nuclear Security Summit in Washington this week…
Administration officials are unequivocal about the coming boom in the very materials Obama speaks of in stark terms as posing one of the world’s greatest threats.
Boom?
There seems to have been some very strange attitudes on display at the conference. The parties acknowledged the dangers of uranium falling into the hands of terrorists – and took some very laudable steps towards preventing that happening - but appear rather more relaxed about the plutonium lying about the place around the world doing the same.
France, Japan, South Korea and the United Kingdom are just some of the United States’ allies in its fight to combat the threat of nuclear terrorism that also already have or are expected to possess large quantities of civilian sector separated plutonium as a byproduct of their atomic energy activities.
[…]
The United Kingdom has 80 metric tons of separated plutonium and France has 100 metric tons of the weapon-grade material, said Ivan Oelrich, vice president of the Federation of American Scientists’ Strategic Security Program,
"I think that plutonium by and large, it is not being protected," he said.
These countries are, coincidentally, those same countries who want the world to have commercial nuclear reactors. MOX (Mixed-OXide) nuclear fuel is being sold as a solution to nuclear proliferation when it actually makes the problem worse: it’s easier to extract the plutonium from MOX than conventional fuel.
The International Atomic Energy Agency has reported 18 separate incidents of missing or stolen quantities of plutonium or highly enriched uranium…
It’s rather like giving everyone a gun and then leaving the ammunition cupboard unlocked. Sooner or later someone you really don’t want to might pull the trigger.
