Israel archive

January 15, 2010

More Atomic Tales: Uranium with juice at Dimona and other stories

Here’s a story.

Last August, Haaretz revealed that workers at the [Israel’s] Dimona nuclear reactor had been required to participate in an experiment in which they drank a certain quantity of uranium mixed with juice… After drinking the liquid, workers were required to give urine samples which were then sent for testing at the lab. The aim of the experiment was to examine how uranium is excreted through the urinary tract.

Without authorisation, and ‘in gross violation of the Helsinki Committee rules - which stipulate when and how it is possible to carry out experiments on human subjects’, two scientists took it upon themselves to give the workers radioactive liquids. We suppose they should be grateful they were told what they were drinking, unlike the unfortunate crew at India’s Kaiga Generation Station who last year had their water cooler spiked with tritium.

The official inquiry into the Dimona experiments submitted its findings last week. They included…

…a recommendation that new and clear procedures stipulating when and how it is permissible to carry out medical experiments on workers be established.

You read that right. The scientists at Dimona need to be told when and how it’s ok to make workers drink uranium.

***

What’s the opposite of a renaissance, do you think? Denaissance, perhaps. We ask because in France, the supposed cradle of the rebirth of the nuclear ‘renaissance’, things seem to be sliding backwards rather than striding forwards.

According to the grid operator RTE, electricity generation from the country’s 58 nuclear reactors fell by 6.8% in 2009, marking a ten year low point. This shortfall meant France was a net importer of electricity for 57 days.

President Nicholas Sarkozy’s nuclear bandwagon is said to be leading the world. Just where it’s leading us however is more difficult to say. It seems to be travelling in the general direction away from a bright future of clean and secure energy supplies.

***

Finally, it’s over to Turkey where it looks as if our grisly prediction of last November is in danger of coming true. The country’s bid to build its first nuclear reactor – killed so many times we’re in danger of losing count – may be clawing its way from the grave once more.

This week ‘Russia and Turkey have signed a joint statement here Wednesday on the construction of a nuclear power plant on Turkish soil’. Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said Russia has ‘significant advantages’. He wasn’t kidding…

"We provide loans and equipment, and we give local construction companies ... a share of 20-25 percent or even 30 percent in the entire volume of contracts," he said, "We provide nuclear fuel and are ready to take back spent nuclear fuel for reprocessing."

The whole package, in fact. Russia will even provide the scientists to give the workers juice laced with uranium (we imagine).

There’s no date for when then first reactor of four will be operational but then why should it be any different from any other reactor? At this early stage the project is estimated to cost ‘between 18 and 20 billion US dollars’. What’s a couple of billion dollars between friends?

Still, it sounds like a plan of a fashion. Turkey, in order to ensure its energy security, wants its first nuclear reactors designed, built and fuelled by Russia. Look, you’ll just have to get someone from the nuclear industry to explain the logic of it to you, ok?

June 12, 2009

Nuclear News: US nuclear industry tries to hijack Obama's climate change bill

Nuclear: Mickey Mouse energy solutionToday's big stories from the nuclear industry:

Guardian: US nuclear industry tries to hijack Obama's climate change bill
’America's nuclear industry and its supporters in Congress have moved to hijack Barack Obama's agenda for greening the economy by producing a rival plan to build 100 new reactors in 20 years, and staking a claim for the money to come from a proposed clean energy development bank. Republicans in the House of Representatives produced a spoiler version of the Democrats' climate change bill this week, calling for a doubling of the number of nuclear reactors in the US by 2030. The 152-page Republican bill contains just one reference to climate change, and proposes easing controls for new nuclear plants. In the Senate, Republican leaders, including the former presidential candidate John McCain, also called this week for loan guarantees for building new reactors to rise from $18.5bn (£11.2bn) to $38bn. Other Republicans have called on the administration to underwrite the $122bn start-up costs of 19 nuclear reactors, whose applications are now under review by the department of energy. If Republican efforts in Congress for a nuclear energy bill and a clean energy bank fail, the US nuclear renaissance is likely to be restricted to new reactors already being built. Jim Riccio, Greenpeace nuclear analyst, said: "The renaissance is on hold or maybe dead on arrival."

Continue reading "Nuclear News: US nuclear industry tries to hijack Obama's climate change bill" »

June 8, 2009

Nuclear News: IAEA discovers traces of uranium in Syria

Nuclear: Mickey Mouse energy solutionToday's big stories from the nuclear industry:

China View: IAEA discovers traces of uranium in Syria
’CAIRO, June 6 (Xinhua) -- The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said on Friday that it has found traces of processed uranium in a second site in Syrian capital Damascus, Pan-Arab Al-Arabiya TV reported on Saturday. The IAEA is investigating a U.S. intelligence report which claimed that a secret DPRK-designed nuclear reactor that Syria has almost completed for the production of plutonium.’

Continue reading "Nuclear News: IAEA discovers traces of uranium in Syria" »