« Nuclear News: French spies targeted UK Greenpeace | Main | Meet Jon Wellinghoff »

We’d like to ask the Florida Power & Light Company a few questions

Share  
 
   

We’ve found another undercover mole from the nuclear industry here at Nuclear Reaction. Remember Rudi who posted disparaging comments about Greenpeace while leaving clues that led us back to the World Nuclear Association?

Well, meet GoneFission who left a comment here over the weekend.

GoneFission doesn’t like us very much. He took exception to our blog post marking the anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster. He calls us liars. He calls us fearmongers. HE USES CAPITAL LETTERS. A LOT. He says we’re ignorant and pathetic. He says it’s INCORRECT to compare commercial nuclear power to a nuclear bomb (he should tell that to Russian nuclear engineer Grigori Medvedev who made the comparison). He says it DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS.

He works for the Florida Power & Light Company.

That’s the same Florida Power & Light Company who says ‘nuclear power has played an important role in FPL's energy mix for more than three decades and provides a safe, clean and reliable source of electricity.’

So we’d like to ask the Florida Power & Light Company a few questions:

1) Can you confirm that GoneFission does indeed work for you or has access to computers in your offices? We can supply his real name if you need us to.

2) Was GoneFission asked by anyone else to leave the comments or did he do it of his own volition?

3) Is it a policy of the Florida Power & Light Company for its employees or associates to leave disparaging comments on anti-nuclear blogs without stating their affiliation and interest?

4) Are GoneFission’s views of Greenpeace the official views of the Florida Power & Light Company?

We look forward to the answers. Not that we’re expecting any. Rudi went very quiet when we pointed out his activities. There was no response from the World Nuclear Association. This is the level of debate you can expect from some within the nuclear industry.

Comments

Hi,

I left you a comment earlier but it never got published.

I have been your reader for quite a while and have enjoyed reading this blog. However, I hope that instead of continuously trying to "uncover" the identity of your readers, why not concentrate on writing more constructive entries. We, who are anti-nuclear, should have our say; those who are pro-nuclear should also be able to leave their comments here. Otherwise it will only make the anti-nuclear look uncivilised and stubborn.

Just a thought.

I left you a comment earlier but it never got published.

Well, we've only had one other comment from a 'Bypasser' and they turned out to have the same IP address as Rudi from the World Nuclear Association.

He is emphatically not anti-nuclear. You are. So, are you a different person who coincidentally picked the name 'Bypasser' or are you Rudi pretending to be anti-nuclear? Do you know what a sockpuppet is, 'Bypasser'?

Those who are pro-nuclear and want to leave comments here should state their interest and affiliations. If they have them. They should have the courage of their convictions without having to stoop to deception.

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated. Thanks for waiting.)