Patrick Moore’s derriere
Meet Patrick Moore. He claims to be one of the founders of Greenpeace but now likes to tell the world that we and those like us ‘are simply gloom and doom prophets and eco loonies, looking to enrich themselves by scaring the general public into believing in threats that don’t exist.’ (It’s true, we’re all incredibly rich here at Greenpeace – wave and say hello if you ever see us flying around in our solid gold helicopters.)
‘I don’t believe there is a global warming problem,’ says Moore. Environmentalists are ‘anti-Christian, anti-God, anti-people and anti-civilization’ and are ‘simply thugs’. Nuclear power is ‘a clean renewable energy source. Science has solved the problem of nuclear waste disposal,’ he says. And ‘when it comes to my derriere, I prefer soft to sandpaper’.
Say that again, Patrick?
‘When it comes to my derriere, I prefer soft to sandpaper.’
That’s what we thought you said. Patrick, really. Is a newspaper article the best place to be discussing your toilet arrangements? We really don’t need to know what you get up to in your bathroom.
Us environmentalists of course prefer sandpaper to soft, don’t we? We find there’s nothing like a really sore derriere to motivate our anti-Christian, anti-God, anti-people and anti-civilization campaigns. Greenpeace, says Moore, want us all to ‘wipe with scratchy paper to rid ourselves of eco-guilt.’
Oh dear. He’s discovered our sinister masterplan. We’d better confess. It is Greenpeace’s top secret aim to force the entire human race into using only scratchy toilet paper. Only when everyone else has bottoms as sore as ours will we end our campaign of terror.

Comments
I knew he was the ex-green of choice for climate change deniers but I didn't know he was onboard the 'anti-Christian, anti-God' loony train (and it seems he's betting the christian version is the correct one, out of many, God really should have been clearer, some kind of stamp of authenticity is needed, like a Disney trademark...). Regardless of his bog roll choices I think he just tipped the wink as to his level of intellectual rigour, also wouldn't God (in all his non existent glory, ahem) kind of like people to look after the planet he made? Or does admitting such fallibility point out the poor workmanship (rushing to finish by Sunday so he could put his feet up) from the big G, so is best avoided. And all those other earth like planets we are discovering, seems god was being unfaithful and lining up some backups for when we go tits up. A shoddy workman/woman and a playa, that's the sort of god your mother warned you about.
Posted by: RickB | March 6, 2009 9:52 PM
I'd like to know what he means by "Science has solved the problem of nuclear waste disposal," and I don’t even want to think about his 'derriere'
Posted by: Ruth Belena | March 9, 2009 5:13 PM
To clarify, this Patrick Moore not this Patrick Moore
Posted by: Ade | March 9, 2009 6:36 PM
Hi - could you tell me your source for the article? I'd love to republish that along with your comments!
(I'm writing this stood up in my gold helicopter - because of all the scratchy paper....)
Posted by: Jim | March 9, 2009 6:53 PM
Hi Jim, there's a copy of the interview on line here. I've updated the post to include it as well.
Posted by: Justin | March 10, 2009 2:52 PM