<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

  <channel rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/">
    <title>The Greenpeace weblog</title>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/</link>
    <description>The Greenpeace Blog</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Irene</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-11-01T15:05:33+01:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.33" />
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:irene.berg@nordic.greenpeace.org"/>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/wind_power_vs_nuclear_energy_n.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/wind_power_vs_nuclear_energy_n.html">
    <title>Wind power vs nuclear energy: no contest</title>
    <description>How about this: the new wind turbines installed in just 2009 alone will generate as much electricity as 12 large nuclear reactors: click image for larger version According to the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), ‘the world’s wind power capacity...</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about this: the new wind turbines installed in just 2009 alone will generate as much electricity as 12 large nuclear reactors:</p>

<center><a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/1_RE_vs_nukes.png"><img alt="1_RE_vs_nukes.png" src="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/1_RE_vs_nukes-thumb.png" width="400" height="296" /></a><br />
<small>click image for larger version</small></center>

<p>According to the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), ‘<a href="http://www.gwec.net/index.php?id=30&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=247&tx_ttnews[backPid]=4&cHash=1196e940a0">the world’s wind power capacity grew by 31% in 2009 adding 37.5 gigawatts to bring total installations up to 157.9 gigawatts</a>’. </p>

<p>Only one nuclear power station went online in 2009 and not one did in 2008. It has been 22 years since nuclear power was able to make the contribution wind did last year. It’s an unbelievably poor performance from a struggling nuclear industry even when you take into account the many problems and dangers building new reactors entails.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.iea.org/techno/etp/ETP_2008_Exec_Sum_English.pdf">The International Energy Agency/Energy Technology Perspectives 2008 Blue Map</a> that suggests a four-fold global expansion of nuclear by 2050. That’s a massive 1,300 large reactors being built in the next 40 years. Even if that wildly optimistic target were to be met it would cut greenhouse gas emissions from the energy sector by just 6%. </p>

<p>The wind energy market, on the other hand, is expending so quickly it is already a year ahead of the projections Greenpeace made in our <a href="http://www.energyblueprint.info/">Energy Revolution</a> scenario. According to GWEC, the wind turbines installed at the end of 2009 will save 204 million tons of CO2 every year. That figure will only increase and quickly. It’s a knock-out blow for nuclear power. Wind energy is clean, reliable and easy to install – everything nuclear power isn’t.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/wind_power_vs_nuclear_energy_n.html</link>
    <dc:subject>Energy Revolution</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-09T17:59:52+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_germanys_nuclear.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_germanys_nuclear.html">
    <title>Nuclear News: Germany&apos;s Nuclear Power Extension Splits Merkel&apos;s Government</title>
    <description>Today&apos;s big stories from the nuclear industry: Germany&apos;s Nuclear Power Extension Splits Merkel&apos;s Government ‘Feb. 8 (Bloomberg) -- German plans to extend the running time of nuclear-power plants split Chancellor Angela Merkel&apos;s government after her environment minister suggested a 40-year...</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Nuclear: Mickey Mouse energy solution" src="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/mickey.jpg" width="150" height="135" align="left" style="padding-right: 10px;" />Today's big stories from the nuclear industry:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-08/germany-s-nuclear-power-extension-splits-merkel-s-government.html"><strong>Germany's Nuclear Power Extension Splits Merkel's Government</strong></a><br />
‘Feb. 8 (Bloomberg) -- German plans to extend the running time of nuclear-power plants split Chancellor Angela Merkel's government after her environment minister suggested a 40-year limit on their operating life. "What the environment minister said isn't the view of the government," Guido Westerwelle, vice chancellor and head of Merkel's Free Democratic Party coalition partner, said on ZDF television. Environment Minister Norbert Roettgen's comments in a Feb. 6 newspaper interview come as Merkel seeks to negotiate the extension with utilities as part of a plan for Germany's future energy mix she wants to present by October. Merkel won Sept. 27 elections pledging to reverse a 2002 law mandating the closure of Germany's 17 nuclear plants by about 2021. She holds to the coalition agreement to extend nuclear plants as a "bridge" to renewable power, her spokesman Ulrich Wilhelm said today.’</p>]]><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_germanys_nuclear.html" title="Continue Reading: Nuclear News: Germany's Nuclear Power Extension Splits Merkel's Government">Continue reading Nuclear News: Germany's Nuclear Power Extension Splits Merkel's Government...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_germanys_nuclear.html</link>
    <dc:subject></dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-09T17:53:34+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_9_un_report_says_the.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_9_un_report_says_the.html">
    <title>February 9: Detention of &quot;the Tokyo Two&quot; contravenes international covenants on human rights, says UN; decision about CEZ&apos;s plans for rebuilding coal-powered power plant Prunerov, delayed</title>
    <description>February 9: Detention of &quot;the Tokyo Two&quot; contravenes international covenants on human rights, says UN; decision about CEZ&apos;s plans for rebuilding coal-powered power plant Prunerov, delayed</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is part of a trial series</em></p>

<p><img alt="J22.bmp" src="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/J22.bmp" width="400" height="266" /></p>

<p>The "Tokyo Two" were featured in <em><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/02/08/2813750.htm">ABC News</a></em> (Australia) saying the UN's judgment is a blow to Japan's judicial system. The UN report says the activists' detention contravenes international covenants on human rights. <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2010/s2813794.htm">Read the interview with Junichi Sato here</a>.</p>

<p>Kumi Naidoo, Executive Director of Greenpeace International, is traveling to Japan to support Junichi Sato and Toru Suzuki during the trials this week. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kumi-naidoo/un-japanese-authorities-b_b_453407.html">Read his entry in <em>The Huffington Post</em> here. </a></p>

<p>IPCC climate scientists focusing on the physical science of climate change in the 2007 reports have criticized colleagues in the field of social and biological science, saying the latter's error has maligned their work, <em><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/08/climate-scientists-melting-glaciers">The Guardian</a></em> reports. The WWF report was cited again for a separate human health section which also referenced two reports from Greenpeace, the World Resources Institute as well as insurance companies. In <a href="http://diepresse.com/home/panorama/klimawandel/538361/index.do">German news</a> claims about the Netherlands and "Africagate" have traveled with comments from Greenpeace Austria, reaffirming that Greenpeace supports the IPCC and did not call for Dr Pachauri to resign.</p>]]><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_9_un_report_says_the.html" title="Continue Reading: February 9: Detention of "the Tokyo Two" contravenes international covenants on human rights, says UN; decision about CEZ's plans for rebuilding coal-powered power plant Prunerov, delayed">Continue reading February 9: Detention of "the Tokyo Two" contravenes international covenants on human rights, says UN; decision about CEZ's plans for rebuilding coal-powered power plant Prunerov, delayed...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_9_un_report_says_the.html</link>
    <dc:subject>Daily News</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>teresa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-09T10:41:22+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/a_lesson_in_nuclear_history_wh.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/a_lesson_in_nuclear_history_wh.html">
    <title>A lesson in nuclear history: What if…</title>
    <description>The events of history can be made or changed by the smallest of events. What if Isaac Newton had missed the apple falling from the tree? If only Einstein’s nurse has understood German we would know what his dying words...</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The events of history can be made or changed by the smallest of events. What if Isaac Newton had missed the apple falling from the tree? If only Einstein’s nurse has understood German we would know what his dying words were. Would Napoleon have won the Battle of Waterloo if <a href="http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=M5bh3dRclMoC&dq=%22Small+Events+That+Changed+History%22+review&source=bl&ots=7VGFA4eLLk&sig=5PGosqvaavmxi9sSa92XwHgbF6o&hl=en&ei=BSBwS4L8FZL00gTb9JTPBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CBIQ6AEwBTgU">his hemorrhoids hadn’t prevented him from riding his horse</a>?</p>

<p>Take Stephanie Cooke quotation of famous German phycisist <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werner_Heisenberg">Werner Heisenberg</a> in her book ‘In Mortal Hands: A Cautionary History of the Nuclear Age’. Heisenberg ‘later contended the atomic bomb was not inevitable’…</p>

<p><em><strong>‘In the summer of 1939 twelve people might still have been able, by coming to mutual agreement, to prevent the construction of atom bombs.’</strong></em></p>

<p>It seems amazing that such a small number of people could have held the future of nuclear weapons (and thus nuclear energy) in their hands. When the Second World War broke out many scientists joined the American atom bomb project in the hope that it would act as a deterrent to any German bomb being built and used. Only later – after completing the American bomb - did they discover that the German programme had been a failure and abandoned. That knowledge had been kept from them and as General Leslie Groves, the Manhattan Project’s leader, admitted, ‘the main purpose of the project was to subdue the Russians’.</p>

<p>Those 12 people knew in 1939 what destructive power the Bomb would have (warnings about atomic weapons had been made as early as the 1900s). A decision from them to abandon the science of nuclear weapons seems such a small thing now and yet the consequences have been huge.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/a_lesson_in_nuclear_history_wh.html</link>
    <dc:subject></dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-08T17:58:13+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_ahmadinejad_says.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_ahmadinejad_says.html">
    <title>Nuclear News: Ahmadinejad says Iran will start producing higher-grade nuclear fuel</title>
    <description>Today&apos;s big stories from the nuclear industry: Ahmadinejad says Iran will start producing higher-grade nuclear fuel ‘Iran&apos;s President ordered his nuclear chief yesterday to start producing higher-grade fuel, raising the stakes in a dispute with the West days after claiming...</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Nuclear: Mickey Mouse energy solution" src="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/mickey.jpg" width="150" height="135" align="left" style="padding-right: 10px;" />Today's big stories from the nuclear industry:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article7018527.ece"><strong>Ahmadinejad says Iran will start producing higher-grade nuclear fuel</strong></a><br />
‘Iran's President ordered his nuclear chief yesterday to start producing higher-grade fuel, raising the stakes in a dispute with the West days after claiming to have accepted a UN-drafted deal. The announcement, made by President Ahmadinejad on live television, drew an immediate reaction from Britain, which said that it was "clearly a matter of serious concern". Robert Gates, the US Defence Secretary, called for an increase in international pressure on Iran. The US, Britain, China and other major powers have proposed that Iran send most of its low-enriched uranium abroad in return for nuclear fuel refined to a level of 20 per cent for use in a Tehran reactor producing medical isotopes. Mr Ahmadinejad appeared to accept the deal last Tuesday. However, a draft of the agreement seen by British MPs showed Iran still refusing to accept UN conditions, and yesterday Mr Ahmadinejad told Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation to start producing higher-grade reactor fuel.’</p>]]><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_ahmadinejad_says.html" title="Continue Reading: Nuclear News: Ahmadinejad says Iran will start producing higher-grade nuclear fuel">Continue reading Nuclear News: Ahmadinejad says Iran will start producing higher-grade nuclear fuel...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_ahmadinejad_says.html</link>
    <dc:subject></dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-08T17:54:54+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_8_mep_godfrey_bloom_a.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_8_mep_godfrey_bloom_a.html">
    <title>February 8: MEP Godfrey Bloom apologises; Britain could save £12bn of public spending over four years - report by WWF, the The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and Greenpeace; Australia is launching research flagship for sustainable agriculture</title>
    <description>This is part of a trial series British Member of the European Parliament, Godfrey Bloom, was filmed at the climate change summit in Copenhagen congratulating the French for bombing the Greenpeace ship the Rainbow Warrior. Later Mr Bloom said he...</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is part of a trial series</em></p>

<p><img alt="RW.bmp" src="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/RW.bmp" width="350" height="229" /></p>

<p>British Member of the European Parliament, Godfrey Bloom, was filmed at the climate change summit in Copenhagen congratulating the French for bombing the Greenpeace ship the <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/rainbow-warrior-bombing/spy-story">Rainbow Warrior</a>. Later Mr Bloom said he had forgotten that one man was killed and French secret service agents were convicted of manslaughter after the bombing, reports <em><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/british-mep-godfrey-bloom-lauds-rainbow-warrior-blast/story-e6frg6so-1225827601727">The Australian</a></em>. Greenpeace, that demanded an <a href="http://www.odt.co.nz/news/national/92285/apology-sought-over-rainbow-warrior-bomb-comment">apology</a> to the crew of the Rainbow Warrior and the Pereira family, got the reply from Bloom "We can disagree about climate change without celebrating the killing of a man." He also told <em><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/news/print.cfm?objectid=10624844">Radio New Zealand</a></em> "I am very very sorry, my belated deep condolences to him and his family. I think it's a great shame that you lose any innocent lives in something like this, I deeply regret that," Mr Bloom said.</p>

<p>Ministers in<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/feb/07/green-alliance-deficit-energy-carbon"> Britain</a> could save £12bn of public spending over four years by clamping down on tax breaks and support for polluting oil exploration, cement, aluminium and transport, according to a report from WWF, the The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and Greenpeace. Doug Parr, Greenpeace's chief scientist, said: "Britain can be a world leader in renewable technologies and low-carbon transport but only if we stop bailing out the dirty industries of the 20th century."</p>]]><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_8_mep_godfrey_bloom_a.html" title="Continue Reading: February 8: MEP Godfrey Bloom apologises; Britain could save £12bn of public spending over four years - report by WWF, the The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and Greenpeace; Australia is launching research flagship for sustainable agriculture">Continue reading February 8: MEP Godfrey Bloom apologises; Britain could save £12bn of public spending over four years - report by WWF, the The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and Greenpeace; Australia is launching research flagship for sustainable agriculture...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_8_mep_godfrey_bloom_a.html</link>
    <dc:subject>Daily News</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>teresa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-08T11:25:50+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/_source_data_taken_from.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/_source_data_taken_from.html">
    <title>US fossil fuel lobbying out-spent climate defenders almost six times, 2009 reports show</title>
    <description>Lobbying: the US fossil fuel and energy utilities spend more more than 6 times as much as alternative energy and environmental groups in 2009</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="LobbyChart.bmp" src="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/LobbyChart.bmp" width="450" height="291" /><br />
Source: Data taken from <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/index.php">The Center for Responsive Politics</a>, cited <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2010/02/02/02greenwire-oil-and-gas-interests-set-spending-record-for-l-1504.html?pagewanted=1"><em>New York Times</em></a> 02.02.10</p>

<p><br />
Last week the <em>New York Times</em> reported on the latest lobbying figures for oil and gas industries in Washington D.C., published by the <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/index.php">Center for Responsive Politics</a>, (also featured in our news blog on <a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_3_more_outcry_over_br.html#more">February 2</a>). The article frighteningly (but not so surprisingly) contrasted the immense lobbying weight of oil, gas and electric utilities against the feeble (but growing) dollar-voice of renewable energy industries and environmental groups. Above is the stark reality, expressed in millions of dollars. In 2009, the oil and gas industry spent $154 million on lobbying, a 16 percent increase on 2008; electric utilities $134.7 million, down from $161.3 in 2008. Meanwhile, alternative energy companies spent only $29 million, up from $22.1 million in 2008; and environmental organizations spent $21.3 million, up from $18.3 million the year before.</p>]]><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/_source_data_taken_from.html" title="Continue Reading: US fossil fuel lobbying out-spent climate defenders almost six times, 2009 reports show">Continue reading US fossil fuel lobbying out-spent climate defenders almost six times, 2009 reports show...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/_source_data_taken_from.html</link>
    <dc:subject>Climate</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>mwilson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-05T15:35:34+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_italy_govt_contes.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_italy_govt_contes.html">
    <title>Nuclear News: Italy govt contests regions&apos; anti-nuclear stance</title>
    <description>Today&apos;s big stories from the nuclear industry: Italy govt contests regions&apos; anti-nuclear stance Italy has turned to its Constitutional Court to overrule regional anti-nuclear energy laws, the government said on Thursday, raising stakes in its drive to revive nuclear power....</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Nuclear: Mickey Mouse energy solution" src="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/mickey.jpg" width="150" height="135" align="left" style="padding-right: 10px;" />Today's big stories from the nuclear industry:<a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idINLDE61312K20100204?sp=true"><br />
<strong>Italy govt contests regions' anti-nuclear stance</strong> </a></p>

<p>Italy has turned to its Constitutional Court to overrule regional anti-nuclear energy laws, the government said on Thursday, raising stakes in its drive to revive nuclear power. The centre-right government will challenge laws which bar construction of nuclear power stations in the southern regions of Puglia, Campania and Basilicata in order to defend its right to set energy policy, Economic Development Minister Claudio Scajola said. "If we do not contest the three laws it would create a dangerous precedent which could lead regions to adopt other decisions negative for siting infrastructure the country needs," he said in a statement.<br />
</p>]]><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_italy_govt_contes.html" title="Continue Reading: Nuclear News: Italy govt contests regions' anti-nuclear stance">Continue reading Nuclear News: Italy govt contests regions' anti-nuclear stance...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_italy_govt_contes.html</link>
    <dc:subject></dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>Aslihan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-05T11:19:26+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_5.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_5.html">
    <title>February 5: Greenpeace Germany release pesticide &quot;black list&quot;; US, Canada going backwards on climate; world leaders,  UN reaffirm support for IPCC</title>
    <description>February 5: Greenpeace Germany release &quot;black list&quot; of pesticides; US, Canada going backwards on climate; world leaders,  UN reaffirm support for IPCC.</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a trial series.</em></p>

<p><img alt="Pesticides.jpg" src="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/Pesticides.jpg" width="430" height="323" /><br />
451 pesticides allowed in the EU are used on our food. Photo: Greenpeace / Holde Schneider</p>

<p>Greenpeace Germany has published a <a href="http://www.volksstimme.de/vsm/ratgeber/gesundheit/gesundheit/?em_cnt=1625413">"black list" of the most dangerous pesticides</a>, which includes 451 different chemicals that are used worldwide and pose health or environmental risks. According to the report, around half of the list are permitted for food production in the EU. "In conventional agriculture chemicals that make people sick and destroy the environment can still be used" said Greenpeace chemicals expert Manfred Santen. The report updates a 2008 version comparing and evaluating the hazards posed by various chemicals in widespread use. <a href="http://www.greenpeace.de/fileadmin/gpd/user_upload/themen/umweltgifte/Schwarze_Liste_der_Pestizide_II_2010.pdf">The full report is available here (<em>page 12 for English translation</em>).</a></p>]]><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_5.html" title="Continue Reading: February 5: Greenpeace Germany release pesticide "black list"; US, Canada going backwards on climate; world leaders,  UN reaffirm support for IPCC">Continue reading February 5: Greenpeace Germany release pesticide "black list"; US, Canada going backwards on climate; world leaders,  UN reaffirm support for IPCC...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_5.html</link>
    <dc:subject>Daily News</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>mwilson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-05T11:00:41+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/morocco_to_rescue_the_nuclear.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/morocco_to_rescue_the_nuclear.html">
    <title>Morocco to rescue the nuclear industry!</title>
    <description>We have to admit we had taken the nuclear industry a bit too seriously until now. After all they had billions and billions and billions of public money, and determined to affect our energy choices and future. But now we...</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have to admit we had taken the nuclear industry a bit too seriously until now. After all they had billions and billions and billions of public money, and determined to affect our energy choices and future. </p>

<p>But now we know the industry is not strong at all and need all the help they can get to survive: Two days ago World Nuclear Association was proud to present that <a href="http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/print.aspx?id=27081">“Nuclear named for Copenhagen reductions”</a>. This is what publicly known as a “huge overstatement”. The whole article is based on  one single country: Morocco.</p>

<p>They might fool their industry subscribers but not us, we do read other news. There are<a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-45834020100202?sp=true"> 55 countries</a> that have communicated their submissions to Copenhagen Accord and 15 of them are the developing countries that communicated their Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions, One of these countries had nuclear plans, which made the industry extremely happy sappy.</p>

<p>Congratulations to the hard working staff of the World Nuclear Association who has been working day and night to keep the spirits up in a dying industry.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/morocco_to_rescue_the_nuclear.html</link>
    <dc:subject></dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>Aslihan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-04T18:34:41+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_the_worlds_radioa.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_the_worlds_radioa.html">
    <title>Nuclear News: The world&apos;s radioactive rubbish is piling up</title>
    <description>Today&apos;s big stories from the nuclear industry The world&apos;s radioactive rubbish is piling up The Pacific Sandpiper, a specially built cargo ship with safety features far in excess of those found on conventional vessels, left Britain&apos;s Barrow port bound for...</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Nuclear: Mickey Mouse energy solution" src="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/mickey.jpg" width="150" height="135" align="left" style="padding-right: 10px;" />Today's big stories from the nuclear industry<a href="http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/eo20100204mr.html"><br />
<strong>The world's radioactive rubbish is piling up</strong> </a></p>

<p>The Pacific Sandpiper, a specially built cargo ship with safety features far in excess of those found on conventional vessels, left Britain's Barrow port bound for Japan the other day. The security surrounding its departure on Jan. 21 indicates that something out of the ordinary is aboard. The Pacific Sandpiper and several sister ships make no port calls on their voyages between Europe and Japan because they carry potentially lethal nuclear material. But the elaborate and costly arrangement casts light on two of the most problematic and controversial aspects of civilian nuclear power - how to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons material and knowhow to terrorists and rogue states, and how to store nuclear waste safely for the long-term when it can remain radioactive for hundreds of years. With the number of power reactors expected to rise from 435 in 31 countries to nearly 570 in 42 countries by 2020, and with much of this expansion expected to take place in Asia and the Middle East, the need for safeguards on uranium or plutonium processing that could be used to make nuclear weapons is obvious. High-level radioactive waste is accumulating at a rate of about 12,000 tons per year worldwide. Without a long-term solution, the pile of radioactive "rubbish" will become so big and so widely dispersed that it may be impossible to manage safely.<br />
</p>]]><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_the_worlds_radioa.html" title="Continue Reading: Nuclear News: The world's radioactive rubbish is piling up">Continue reading Nuclear News: The world's radioactive rubbish is piling up...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_the_worlds_radioa.html</link>
    <dc:subject></dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>Aslihan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-04T16:15:53+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_4.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_4.html">
    <title>February 4: Tuna Ban in 18 Months, EU pledges; Success in India as 10 states block BT-Brinjal; and the US Federal Trade Commission plans to crack down on &quot;greenwash&quot;</title>
    <description>February 4: Tuna Ban in 18 Months, EU pledges; Success in India as 10 states block BT-Brinjal; and the US Federal Trade Commission plans to crack down on &quot;greenwash&quot;</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a trial series.</em></p>

<p><img alt="tuna.jpg" src="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/tuna.jpg" width="400" height="278" /><br />
<em>Yellowfin tuna at the Honolulu fish market</em>, Photo: Greenpeace / Alex Hofford</p>

<p><a href="http://www.sudouest.com/accueil/actualite/economie/article/856691/mil/5673391.html">France voted yesterday to suspend international trade in bluefin tuna</a> after an 18 month-period in which new scientific research will be carried out to assist Brussels policy-making, potentially with conditions that allow for some continued <em>artisanal</em> fishing. The Minister of Ecology said it was a serious decision but "necessary, since most scientists believe that the resource is in danger." Currently, 80 percent of world tuna is bought by Japan, which according to French media reports has already begun a campaign to lobby against the future ban. <a href="http://www.20minutes.fr/article/382158/France-Le-thon-bientot-place-sur-liste-rouge.php">The decision may also be adopted</a> at the next meeting of the UN Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) being held next month. France has twenty-nine votes, and so far Germany, the UK and Italy also supported a ban. Francoise Chartier of Greenpeace France raised concerns about the 18-month interim period, saying that by the time the ban would actually be introduced, it could be too late.</p>]]><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_4.html" title="Continue Reading: February 4: Tuna Ban in 18 Months, EU pledges; Success in India as 10 states block BT-Brinjal; and the US Federal Trade Commission plans to crack down on "greenwash"">Continue reading February 4: Tuna Ban in 18 Months, EU pledges; Success in India as 10 states block BT-Brinjal; and the US Federal Trade Commission plans to crack down on "greenwash"...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_4.html</link>
    <dc:subject>Daily News</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>mwilson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-04T11:03:05+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_reactions_nuclear_glos_1.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_reactions_nuclear_glos_1.html">
    <title>Nuclear Reaction’s Nuclear Glossary</title>
    <description>Hello, and welcome to Nuclear Reaction’s Nuclear Glossary. In this occasional series we’ll be bringing you a handy cut-out-and-keep guide to what the nuclear industry says and what the nuclear industry actually means. Never again will you be confused, fooled...</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, and welcome to Nuclear Reaction’s Nuclear Glossary. In this occasional series we’ll be bringing you a handy cut-out-and-keep guide to what the nuclear industry says and what the nuclear industry actually means. Never again will you be confused, fooled or otherwise misled by nuclear industry propaganda, greenwash and false promises.</p>

<p><strong>What they say:</strong> ‘Safe’<br />
<strong>What they mean:</strong> ‘<a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2009/03/no_to_nuclear_power_101_clean.html">Produces vast amounts of dangerous waste that will be a burden for the next 240,000</a> years to while dispersing dangerous radionuclides into the environment.’</p>

<p><strong>What they say:</strong> ‘Cheap’<br />
<strong>What they mean:</strong> ‘<a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2009/03/no_to_nuclear_power_101_cheap.html">Hardly affordable even with government subsidies and loan guarantees</a>.’</p>

<p><strong>What they say:</strong> ‘<a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2009/06/the_spin_and_fiction_of_vincen.html">We believe nuclear is competitive</a>.’<br />
<strong>What they mean:</strong> ‘<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/1369ae48-4972-11de-9e19-00144feabdc0,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1369ae48-4972-11de-9e19-00144feabdc0.html&_i_referer=">New nuclear power stations will not be built in Britain unless the government provides financial support for the industry</a>.’</p>

<p><strong>What they say:</strong> ‘<a href="http://us.arevablog.com/2009/05/29/nuclear-renaissance-is-just-fine-thank-you/">Learning curve</a>’<br />
<strong>What they mean:</strong> ‘<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sitesearch=weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/&ei=CdpySvupD-KgjAf4vu2nBg&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=olkiluoto&spell=1">Massive cost and schedule overruns, safety violations, design concerns, and thousands of construction defects</a>.’</p>

<p><strong>What they say:</strong> ‘Reliable’<br />
<strong>What they mean:</strong> ‘<a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2009/05/no_to_nuclear_power_101_reliab.html">Unreliable</a>’</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_reactions_nuclear_glos_1.html</link>
    <dc:subject></dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>Aslihan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-03T19:33:24+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_frances_bnp_parib.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_frances_bnp_parib.html">
    <title>Nuclear News: France&apos;s BNP Paribas Quits Bulgaria Belene N-Plant</title>
    <description>Today&apos;s big stories from the nuclear industry: France&apos;s BNP Paribas Quits Bulgaria Belene N-Plant BNP Paribas SA, France&apos;s largest bank by market value, who was hired by the previous Socialist government to help fund the construction of Belene nuclear power...</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Nuclear: Mickey Mouse energy solution" src="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/mickey.jpg" width="150" height="135" align="left" style="padding-right: 10px;" />Today's big stories from the nuclear industry:<br />
<a href="http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=112684"><strong><br />
France's BNP Paribas Quits Bulgaria Belene N-Plant</strong> </a></p>

<p>BNP Paribas SA, France's largest bank by market value, who was hired by the previous Socialist government to help fund the construction of Belene nuclear power plant at the Danube river town, has ditched the project. This has been announced by French media Enviro2B, confirming earlier Bulgaria reports and rumours. State-run power utility NEK, which holds a 51% stake in the scheme, has confirmed that relationships with the bank have been ended by mutual consent without any claims. "Faced with a heated debate started by environmentalists, the French bank BNP Paribas has after all decided to withdraw from the construction of Bulgaria's Belene nuclear power plant, the financing of which the French bank was coordinating," French Enviro2B reports. The news comes two and a half months after German utility RWE abandoned plans to participate in the construction of a 2000MW nuclear plant in the Bulgarian Danube town of Belene due to funding problems.<br />
</p>]]><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_frances_bnp_parib.html" title="Continue Reading: Nuclear News: France's BNP Paribas Quits Bulgaria Belene N-Plant">Continue reading Nuclear News: France's BNP Paribas Quits Bulgaria Belene N-Plant...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2010/02/nuclear_news_frances_bnp_parib.html</link>
    <dc:subject></dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>Aslihan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-03T19:27:54+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_3_more_outcry_over_br.html" />
  <item rdf:about="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_3_more_outcry_over_br.html">
    <title>February 3: More outcry over Brazil&apos;s controversial Belo Monte mega-dam; Fossil Fuel Lobbying for 2009 sets record high; and Greenpeace Germany ranks toxic lettuce</title>
    <description>February 3: More outcry over Brazil&apos;s controversial Belo Monte mega-dam; Fossil Fuel Lobbying for 2009 sets record high; and Greenpeace Germany ranks toxic lettuce</description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is part of a trial series.</em></p>

<p><img alt="Belo%20Monte%2C%20Xingu%20River.jpg" src="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/Belo%20Monte%2C%20Xingu%20River.jpg" width="400" height="267" /><br />
View of the Jericoá Rapids at the Big Bend of the Xingu River. Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/internationalrivers/2624876895/in/set-72157605906483063/">Monti Aguirre</a>.</p>

<p><strong>Brazilian mega-dam causes outcry</strong><br />
The $11-17 billion project in the heart of the Amazon, on the Xingu River in the northern state of Para, aiming to meet Brazil's soaring demand for electricity, will be the second largest damn in the world. There has been outcry over the environmentally destructive impacts of the dam and displacement of indigenous people. The government minister in control of the project, Carlos Minc said - <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6105MY20100201">according to Reuters</a> - 250 square kilometers (96.5 sq miles) of land would be flooded by the Belo Monte dam and that this had been reduced from 5,000 in the original plans for ecological reasons. <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5h4luth1JpEvsrxyQzLa-HfAzjl5w">AFP reported that 500 sq km would be flooded</a>. Among the utilities wanting to build and operate the dam are Brazil's state-run Eletrobras.</p>]]><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_3_more_outcry_over_br.html" title="Continue Reading: February 3: More outcry over Brazil's controversial Belo Monte mega-dam; Fossil Fuel Lobbying for 2009 sets record high; and Greenpeace Germany ranks toxic lettuce">Continue reading February 3: More outcry over Brazil's controversial Belo Monte mega-dam; Fossil Fuel Lobbying for 2009 sets record high; and Greenpeace Germany ranks toxic lettuce...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <link>http://weblog.greenpeace.org/makingwaves/archives/2010/02/february_3_more_outcry_over_br.html</link>
    <dc:subject>Daily News</dc:subject>
    <dc:creator>mwilson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-03T10:39:34+01:00</dc:date>
  </item>


      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
</rdf:RDF>