Greenpeace International Greenpeace Island
GE Soya > GE Everything Consumer Power vs. Corporate Control Feeding Pigs, Not People Seeds of hope

Please note this is ARCHIVE MATERIAL. For current information about Greenpeace's campaign against GE Foods please see our international site.

Websites Worldwide
Join Greenpeace
Spotlight News
A Global Campaign for a Global Issue
Q & A: what is GE?
Why GE is old fashioned
What is happening in your country...
GE Soya Cycle Exposed
Spotlight Info

leftbanner.gif


April 21, 2004

Chinese consumer vows to continue following Nestlé defeat

Zhu Yanling.jpg

China's first consumer court case on the labelling of genetically engineered (GE) food has been rejected on technical grounds. Last year, a young mother from Shanghai, Zhu Yanling, sued food giant Nestlé for not labelling the Nesquik which she had been buying for her two-year old baby.

On 19th April, Shanghai No.2 Intermediate Court ruled that the product did not contain GE ingredients based on a test by a Ministry of Agriculture approved laboratory and that Zhu did not have a case.

“I don’t consider this a loss,” said Zhu Yanling, a young woman working in the financial industry. “The case has already made more Chinese consumers aware of our rights to know what we are eating.” Ms. Zhu said she would appeal against the judgment and continue the fight

The laboratory, Shanghai Agriculture Research Institution Biotechnology Center, was commissioned to conduct the first test by the Court in August 2003. The product was found to contain ingredients derived from GE soya. But Nestlé objected to the testing result and the Court ordered a second test to reconfirm the findings in December 2003.

However, the second test proved negative. The Court decided to base its judgment on the second test as the method used was the official testing method approved by the Ministry of Agriculture.

With support from Greenpeace, Zhu Yanling and her lawyer visited Switzerland and met with representatives of the company in December 2003. “Nestlé told me in the meeting that they would continue using GE ingredients in China. They don't believe Chinese consumers are as concerned about GE food as Europeans are. Such a double standard is a moral question, not a legal one, and it is up to consumers to judge whether it is right or wrong."


 
 
In depth
Take Action
Cool Stuff
Interesting Links
Briefing Documents
Press Releases
EU Press Releases
Featured Content

Menu Corners Sign up! Menu Corners
Sign up for free action alerts via our E-zine.





Send
Join discussions at our Cybercentre.
leftbanner.gif
Privacy Copyright Contact us