Twitter feed:

Feed / Bookmark

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Subscribe

More feeds:
  Political updates only

Add to your page:
Click to get widget. Full feed
Click to get widget. Political updates only

Technorati & Stuff

« A BASIC lead on climate | Main | EU: lead in the battle to save the Climate – we expect nothing less »

Another deadline, another milestone, another lurch up the curve...

GP01XU7.jpg

Another update from our "Post-Copenhagen" climate campaigner - Paul Horsman:

It is 21 years since the first scientific assessment of climate change was published; 18 years since the Rio Earth Summit at which the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was agreed. Twelve years have passed since the Kyoto Protocol was agreed and two years since the Bali Action plan. Each of these passing milestones has been variously described as ‘first steps’ and ‘ways forward’, demonstrating commitments to protect the climate. And with each passing milestone we have moved further up the curve of growing greenhouse gas emissions heading inexorably towards catastrophic climate change.

Six weeks have gone since the December climate summit where the Copenhagen Accord proposed a deadline of January 31 by which governments were to pledge how much they were going to take action to protect the climate. And as this latest milestone passed on Sunday, we see again the size of the gap between the action needed to protect the climate and the willingness of politicians to take this action. Politicians clearly are still listening more to the false honeyed whispers of industrial lobbyists and bankers than they are to the clamour of the millions of people calling for leadership and action.

Some would have us believe that because countries are making pledges it means that the governments are taking action. Nothing could be further from the truth. The reality is that all they have done is to dust-off previously stated commitments, dress them up in letters to the UN and make believe they are doing something to protect the climate.

The pledges will not even achieve one aim of the accord – keeping global temperature rises well below 2 degrees. The combined pledges of governments commit the world to at least 3 degrees of warming and beyond according to the UN’s own assessment and takes us on an unstoppable pathway where emissions will peak well after 2020 date (in order to stay well below the 2 degree threshold, emissions need to peak by 2015). And so the Accord fails its first test.

The reality is that to stay below a warming limit of 2 degrees C requires industrialised countries as a block to agree to cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 40%by 2020 and developing countries to agree to reducing future emission by between 15 and 30% in the same time-frame. The pledges made by industrialised countries mean a reduction of only between 11 and 19%. Even worse, if credits for protecting forests are taken into account then emission cuts from burning fossil fuels fall to between 6 and 14%. It could almost be business as usual for these industrial interests if uncertainties in economic forecasts are taken into consideration.

The accord was always a weak political agreement and now we see what governments have pledged – the weakness is all the more obvious.

And what would a 3 degree plus world have in store? Average global temperatures are now 0.8 degrees C about pre-industrial levels and there are already significant climate impacts. From the melting permafrost and glaciers, inundated islands and deltas, drought damaged farms, and storm battered continents. The world in the grip of global climate change is stark indeed.

GP01VL4.jpg
The survival of tribal communities in Russia is already under threat from global warming as the ancient permafrost melts. © Greenpeace / Will Rose

In the face of such mounting evidence, thousands of credible scientific reports, even statements from world leaders about the dire threat which climate change poses - how and why such inaction?

For over 20 years an un-holy alliance of fossil fuel interests, climate deniers and some governments has been working consistently to derail the climate talks. And the knives are out again as the science is attacked by perverse vested interests and governments run scared of taking the courageous stand needed. Before, during and since the Copenhagen climate summit, the climate change deniers, those who put profits before people, those who would fiddle while the planet burns have kept up pressure against any deal to protect the climate. And now commentary again seems to be gearing up to reducing further out expectations for a fair, ambitious and legally binding agreement.

The ground is shifting markedly. Many governments have used the need for a global agreement to tackle this issue before taking their own steps as an excuse for national inaction. Now some of these same governments trash the global process and say national interests are more important.

But while national legislation is needed to cut emissions, the global framework is essential to ensure fairness to the most vulnerable, the appropriate ambition for targets and a global legal framework. The global framework is the only place where vulnerable countries can have their say. Simply leaving it to the wealthier countries – whether in the G8, the G20 or Major Emitters Forum – is like asking Dracula to share out the blood.

Copenhagen was a point where millions made their voice heard. The clamour is unstoppable and no matter what the politicians say is practical, no matter what the commentators advise is realistic, and no matter what industrial interests say is affordable – the growing voice will not be silenced – it will be turned into action – direct action to protect the climate....

Now – more than ever – we need to take action and change the future!

GP01V1H.jpg
Image (above): Sea level rise is already causing serious problems for the people of the Sundarbans. Ajit Das lives in Ghoramara island. "We cannot stay here because of the flooding. We don't know where we will go or what we will do. We cannot bring our grandchildren up here."© Greenpeace / Peter Caton

Top Image: Greenpeace activists protest in Chapultepec Lake by creating a mock climate disaster scenario. Several cars are covered by water, representing floods that result from climate change. The activists also display a sign "Bienvenido - Welcome. Mexico" Mexico will be the venue of the 16th UNFCCC meeting (COP-16) in 2010. © Teresa Osorio / Greenpeace

Want a good deal for the climate? Sign up as a climate activist!
Email: Country:

Comments

Mobilze, mobilize, mobilize.

industrialised countries must make a very big step to help they must take the action to change their poleticy and God help us ..

Greenpeace is keeping very quiet about "Climategate", "Pachaurigate", "Glaciergate", "Amazongate", “Disastergate” and all of the other “gates” still to come, all under the umbrella of “IPCCgate”. These have destroyed the credibility of the UN’s IPCC and its supporters. It is “fortunate” that “Climategate” made its disclosures ahead of COP15 in Copenhagen otherwise the politicians might have been able to force through their global confidence trick using its climate change propaganda to support its true agenda of:
- redistributionof wealth from developed to underdeveloped economies,
- establishment of a frameworkk for global government,
- enhancement of the finances of a privileged few.
As it turned out, COP15 was a fiasco and now support for the IPCC is collapsing.

The IPCC presents its reports claiming them to be unbiassed and based upon the latest available peer-reviewed science. The various climate “Gates” have shown this to be a false claim. Numerous Internet sites have been established for the sole purpose of exposing the flaws in this claim and one is of particular relevance to Greenpeace and its sister organisation WWF. That site is Climatequotes,com (Note 1), which provides some very interesting articles, one page of which is listing all of the dubious IPCC AR4 citations as they become identified (Note 2).

This page starts QUOTE: It seems every single day recently that a new dodgy citation is found in the IPCC's Assessment Reports. To help keep track of them all, I'm putting them all on one page. If you find a questionable citation, e-mail me or comment below and I'll include it on the list. If you have a friend who always brings up the IPCC whenever you're talking about climate change, send him or her here and let them see just how 'scientific' the IPCC is. (Credit to Donna Laframboise for AR4 WWF & Greenpeace citations) UNQUOTE.

It goes on to list IPCC AR4 citations of papers from WWF (16, finishing with the paper underpinning “Glaciergate”), Greenpeace (8) and “Other questionable citations“.

It’s all wonderful stuff, making quite clear how incredible is the IPCC’s claim about its assessment reports.

NOTES:
1) see http://climatequotes.com/about-us/
2) see http://climatequotes.com/scientists/the-ipccs-questionable-citations/

Pete Ridley human-made global climate change skeptic.

@Pete
Sorry about the delay in posting your comment - we manually approve each comment posted to avoid spammers and sometimes this doesn't happen as quickly as we would like.
Greenpeace has responded to the IPCC situation here: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/no-scandal-behind-these-gates
-Laura

Every country should take strict measures to protect the environment and modify development policies in an eco-friendly manner.

Ya i agree, we will really need those big countries to work together for Mother Earth. Global Warming has caused some really bad natural disaster to human. I think this is how Mother Earth Unleashing its fury on uncaring Humans (http://www.seemotherearth.com/2010/01/mother-earth-unleashing-its-fury.html).

Not that, either I am a warmist or a denier but humans have taken a toll on the natural functioning of the eco systems around the world. But the evidence might be convincing for some people and just be bogus for other but in these rather difficult times the truth needs to be out. and weather AGW or not, the development of the human race on this planet is unsustainable, on our climate, and on our fellow contemporary species on this planet we call home.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

blablabla%20act%20now150.jpg
www.flickr.com
Greenpeace International's COP 15 photoset MoreCOP 15 photos