No redemption
During our action in the tar sands of northern Alberta, Canada last week we were running a Twitter and comment feed on the Stop the Tar Sands landing page - so that while people watched the live video feed of our activists they were able to send messages of support ... or condemnation. And we received lots of both.
These ranged from the general: 'Way to go, Greenpeace!' to the inevitable : 'A bunch of unwashed hippies in raincoats ain't gonna stop them'. (Just for the record we did stop them - activists shut down Shell's entire Albian mining operation during their 30+ hour occupation.)
One of the less hippie-focused criticisms that kept coming up again and again was that we weren't showing any images or videos of 'reclaimed' tar sands property - and therefore we were only showing one side of the story.
The idea that the companies currently operating in the tar sands can 'reclaim' the land they have destroyed is one of the myths that is allowing atrocious acts of negligence to be committed in the name of tar sands development.
Companies with operations in the tar sands - like Shell, Syncrude, Suncor, etc - can basically do what they like with the land based on the idea that they will then return the land to it's previous state - or in some cases, they claim to return the land in better condition then they got it. Oh yeah? Reclaim this:

Boreal forest doesn't just grow back. Especially not when you have scrapped it away, right down to the rock underneath.
However, in the spirit of responding to viewer requests - I will now show some images of tar sands land that is supposedly 'reclaimed'.

Welcome to the Syncrude bison sanctuary. The green and brown bits make up the beginning of some supposedly 'reclaimed' lands which have been turned into a bison sanctuary. The bison (did not get their on their own, but) were placed there by Syncrude - one of the largest operators in the tar sands. A small group of them huddles together in a small fenced off area in the distance, more fencing keeps visitors from getting close. Beyond the green and brown bits you see in the picture are massive toxic tailings ponds, stretching for kilometres right up to the edge of a huge industrial complex.

Smokestacks fill the sky with billowing smoke and flaring fire, and from a hill it is clear that this ugliness stretches far into the horizon. It is staggering.
The sign above reads: 'Wood Bison, a truly noble beast'.
At this point in time there have been very few attempts at reclamation in the tar sands and no site has been certified as reclaimed by Alberta Environment.
[Correction! Apologies - there has been one site issued with a reclamation certificate. "In March of 2008, Alberta designated a rolling forested area with hiking trails and lookout points as the first piece of oil sands land to be reclaimed. The Alberta government issued a reclamation certificate to Syncrude Canada Ltd. for the 104-hectare parcel of land known as Gateway Hill approximately 35 kilometres north of Fort McMurray." This site was not a mine - so there has been no reclaimation of a mining site. The site in question was a place where 'overburden' was placed - overburden is the leftovers from stripping away the boreal forest, including muskeg, soil and rocks. More info here.]
So. If no *mining site has been certified as reclaimed - then where are the noble bison roaming? They are roaming on a bit of grass next to a toxic lake in the middle of the largest industrial complex on the planet.
Another sign post at the Syncrude bison sanctuary: 'In 1996 a herd of wood bison was introduced to the reclaimed grassland you see before you (this area was once part of Syncrude's mine!)' I think this is the part where Syncrude wants the reader to be pleasantly surprised - but only a severely short-sighted person would be unable to notice the horror show about two kilometres away pumping toxins into air and water.
Reclamation can't be the false hope that allows tar sands development to continue, it's just not a justification that stands up against all of the arguments for stopping the tar sands.
[Support our campaign to Stop the Tar Sands and learn more here.]

Comments
This is typical of the big money oil organizations. Show the public something with a wide angle lens to make it look as though they have found another way to reclaim the land and put it back together better than it was before. I wonder how the Coal Companies managed to pull the wool over the eyes of everyone right before they started to take the tops of the great Smoky Mountains. How the hell do you undo that? Put a Golf course on it maybe? That's really reclaiming the true nature that was there. If big money and the companies that are behind them don't get stopped then kiss nature goodbye baby! They are the ones that have held the patent on a fuel that was developed using electricity and water, having a residue of only water, just so they could line their pockets with money and live the great life (on the backs of others and on the back of mother nature). Why should they care in the first place! They won't have to live through the hell this planet will turn into after their gone!
Posted by: William E. Cox | September 30, 2009 11:37 AM
Okay so you want to shut these places down. Than where are you going to get gas for your vehicles, oil for your packaging, and so on and so forth. As well areyou going to give the men and women jobs who are working in these places. Alot of them work hours away from home, away from their families, supporting small children, and so on and so forth. Your not just screwing with the companies, you are screwing with your pay check providers lives caus eyou never give both sides of the story and you always go over board. Things can be dealt with in a lot better ways.
you are taking food out of my mouth. My husband works in Suncor, due to earning a good wage, and giveing me and our children a better life than I had when I was growing up... You will soon realize that your supports will know the truth and well yes....
You over act everything, this is nothing new. Just like the seal hunts and animal acts you have deminstrated. If you care so much maybe you would deal with things properly instead of trespassing and chaining yourselves to conveyors.... Personally I think an accident should happen. And maybe if your activists were hurt than you would see... Than again you have college students who have been miss informed doing your dirty work.... one of these days the company is just gonna ignore you being there, cuz you shouldnt be there, and accidents will happen... I know I would... I am all for saving our environment, but not this way... You make me and many other sick...
Posted by: Kara-Lynn Nadon | September 30, 2009 11:07 PM
Someone needs to get into that enclosure and get blood samples from those bison. Are they supposed to be the canary in the mine? See the cage. Hear the mine owner tell you it's OK to go down?
It is no wonder that PM Harper doesn't feel the need to represent Canada's position on climate issues to the world. He's already made his views abundantly clear by condoning, and (let's come right out and say it)actively participating in, the rape of the north.
Thanks for the photos. Too many Canadians have no idea what the ravaged face of our Mother looks like these days. And now that Harper thinks he has her poisoned body suitably subdued, he doesn't even have the gonads to look her in the eye.
Posted by: Michele Franklin | October 1, 2009 3:03 AM
You write: “At this point in time there have been very few attempts at reclamation in the tar sands and no site has been certified as reclaimed by Alberta Environment.”
You are incorrect. For your future reference, more than a year ago, the Alberta government issued its first reclamation certificate to Syncrude Canada Ltd. for the 104-hectare parcel of land known as Gateway Hill approximately 35 kilometres north of Fort McMurray.
Greenpeace has incorrect information posted elsewhere on its websites as well.
- David Sands, for the Government of Alberta.
Posted by: Government of Alberta | October 1, 2009 6:06 PM
Funny thing, you flew in on a plane, wow, oilsands I imagine supplied alot of the petrochemicals for that sortie. You drive in cars, shop in stores etc. So, it seems, you use the same energy sources that the rest of the world does, then protest the way the energy and items are obtained. You did not shut down a plant, you shut down a belt. One of many. An annoyance at best. You forgot to say just how big the Bison sanctuary is, not just the wee bit you photographed. Your eyes might have been burning, but step back 10 feet, AWAY from the rock dust (thats right, on the conveyor its still just dirt from the ground) and you would have been fine. You have an opinion, great. Voice it. Hence your propaganda site here. You want a change, give a viable option, AND if its so dear to you, stop using anything that might be gotten using petrochemicals. Until that point you are just a hypocrite, which is very hard to take seriously. I live in Fort McMurray and noticed you omitted alot of things, such as the constant air quality monitoring. Its online, check it out.
Posted by: Paul Sunder | October 2, 2009 3:19 AM
I think they fear my presence far more than Greenpeace. One site that was recently protested by Greenpeace has gone as far as to order a sub-contractor not to hire me in case I obtain further evidence against them. Greenpeace is all good, but they needed people on the inside that know what to look for to gather facts on spills, releases, false emissions data and so on.
Now you have blown that opportunity out of the water. Some of us that work and worked in the industry know the truth, but sensational stage shows only draw attention to Greenpeace and not the real issues caused by the poorly motivated and led employees at these sites. Not all those that work on these sites like what they see, or are ORDERED to do. But without the chance to collect what is needed Greenpeace has just blown three years of hard work.
Thanks for nothing...
Posted by: Enough Games | October 3, 2009 5:15 PM